Course
PhD Course in Philosophy of Science (DUH102)
Dette er emnebeskrivelsen for studieåret 2022-2023. Merk at det kan komme endringer.
Semesters
Fakta
Emnekode
DUH102
Vekting (stp)
5
Semester undervisningsstart
Spring
Undervisningsspråk
English, Norwegian
Antall semestre
1
Vurderingssemester
Spring
Timeplan
Litteratur
Content
The course will give a broad orientation on central issues in the philosophy of science related to the social sciences and the humanities (‘the human sciences’). Topics include:
- Objectivity and the role of values in the human sciences.
- Understanding (interpretation) versus explanation.
- Holism versus methodological individualism.
Learning outcome
Knowledge
The student will gain knowledge of:
- The philosophical foundations for different theoretical research approaches in the social sciences and the humanities.
Skills
By the end of the course, the student will be able to:
- Facilitate critical reflection and argumentation upon presuppositions that may easily be taken for granted in their own research tradition, or in science as a whole.
- Relate discipline-specific topics to general reflections and concepts of philosophy of science.
General competence
By the end of the course, the student will be able to:
- Demonstrate competence in analytical discussion and well-structured academic argumentation.
Forkunnskapskrav
Ingen
Exam
Form of assessment | Weight | Duration | Marks | Aid | Exam system | Withdrawal deadline | Exam date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual paper | 1/1 | Passed / Not Passed | — | — | — |
- Evaluation will be based on one individual paper (4000 words (+/- 10%)) on a self-chosen topic approved by the instructor.
- The paper must be written in English or in a Scandinavian language.
- The paper must be submitted within six weeks after the topic has been approved.
- The paper is evaluated pass/fail.
Vilkår for å gå opp til eksamen/vurdering
Active participation in lectures and seminarsActive participation in lectures and seminars
Active participation in lectures and seminars (at least 75% attendance).
Fagperson(er)
Course teacher:
Marianne Hafnor BøeCourse coordinator:
Ståle GundersenCourse teacher:
Ulrich DettweilerStudy Program Director:
Hein BerdinesenCourse teacher:
Hein BerdinesenMethod of work
The course will be held as five seminars.
Åpent for
PhD candidates enrolled in PhD programmes at the University of Stavanger and at cooperating research institutions may participate in the course.
Emneevaluering
An evaluation form in accordance with the expectations in the UiS quality system will be made available to the candidates after the completion of the course. The course participants are encouraged to contribute to the course evaluation.
Litteratur
Book Philosophy of social science : a new introduction Cartwright, N., Montuschi, E. (eds.), Oxford, Oxford University Press, X, 330 s., 2014, isbn:978-0-19-964509-1; 978-0-19-964510-7, Chapter 1-4, 6-9 and 12-15. The textbook can be bought at the bookstore at campus. Book Chapter What is a Social Fact? Émile Durkheim, Lukes, Steven; Halls, W. D., What is a Social Fact?, New York, Free Press, xlii, 229 s., 1982, 50-59, Website The Philosophy of Social Science. Gorton, W.A., Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2010, https://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-sci/View online Book Chapter What is Social Construction? The Teenage Pregnancy Example. Hacking, I., What is Social Construction? The Teenage Pregnancy Example., Maidenhead, Open University Press, XII, 481 s., 2003, 421-427, isbn:0335208843; 0335208851; 9780335208845; 9780335208852, Book Chapter Mechanism Elster, J., Elster, J., Mechanism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, VIII, 184 s., 1989, 3-10, isbn:0521376068; 0521374553, Reference Entry Methodological Holism in the Social Sciences Zahle, J., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/holism-social/View online Article The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology? Bryman, A., Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. For the London School of Economics, 75-92, The British Journal of Sociology, 1, 35, 1984, p. 75-92, https://bibsys-ur.userservices.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/47BIBSYS_UBIS/openurl?ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_id=10_1&ctx_tim=2019-11-27T15%3A39%3A18IST&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com-jstor_archive_2&req_id=&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Debate%20about%20Quantitative%20and%20Qualitative%20Research:%20A%20Question%20of%20Method%20or%20Epistemology?&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20Journal%20of%20Sociology&rft.btitle=&rft.aulast=Bryman&rft.auinit=&rft.auinit1=&rft.auinitm=&rft.ausuffix=&rft.au=Bryman,%20Alan&rft.aucorp=&rft.date=1984-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.part=&rft.quarter=&rft.ssn=&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=75-92&rft.artnum=&rft.issn=00071315&rft.eissn=14684446&rft.isbn=&rft.sici=&rft.coden=&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/590553&rft.object_id=&rft.eisbn=&rft.edition=&rft.pub=Routledge%20and%20Kegan%20Paul%20Ltd.%20For%20the%20London%20School%20of%20Economics&rft.place=&rft.series=&rft.stitle=&rft.bici=&rft_id=info:bibcode/&rft_id=info:hdl/&rft_id=info:lccn/&rft_id=info:oclcnum/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_id=info:eric/((addata/eric}}&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_archive_2%3E10.2307/590553%3C/jstor_archive_2%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E,language=eng,view=UBIS&svc_dat=viewit&user_ip=10.16.56.140&req.skin=primo&rft_pqid=36750645&rft_galeid=&rft_cupid=&rft_eruid=&rft_nurid=&rft_ingid=View online Book Chapter Must We Assume Others are Rational? Fay, B., Fay, B., Must We Assume Others are Rational?, Oxford, Blackwell, XI, 266 s., 1996, 92-111, isbn:9781557865380; 9781557865373; 1557865388; 155786537X, Book Chapter Must We Comprehend Others in Their Own Terms? Fay, B., Fay, B., Must We Comprehend Others in Their Own Terms?, Oxford, Blackwell, XI, 266 s., 1996, 112-135, isbn:9781557865380; 9781557865373; 1557865388; 155786537X,
The course description is retrieved from FS (Felles studentsystem). Version 1